Today’s Erlang Thursday is on lists:flatmap/2.
The selection of this function comes from some Elixir exercises I was doing earlier in the week, and was getting confused because when using the Enum.flat_map/2
function in Elixir wasn’t working as I expected it to.
I circled back to Erlang to check the behavior of lists:flatmap/2
in Erlang, and after getting over my confusion that the flatmap function wasn’t working in Erlang, the common behavior made sense, and I realized I contorted the concept in my head and it was time to take a step back and figure out what lists:flatmap/2
actually does.
Somehow what I had convinced myself that lists:flatmap/2
did was to take a list of items that were nested arbitrarily deep, and mapped over the flattened list in the equivalent of this:
lists:map(fun(X) -> X * X end, lists:flatten([1, [[2, [3]], 4]])). % [1,4,9,16]
Looking closer at the documentation, after even trying Ruby’s flat_map function, it was clear I had completely confused myself as to how it should work, so time to carefully read the Erlang docs.
They stated that lists:flatmap/2
takes a function that takes an item of type A
and returns a list of items that are of type B
, and that the second argument to lists:flatmap/2
was a list of items of type A
.
Being already confused based off how I thought it should work, it wasn’t registering until I saw the part of the documentation that describes that lists:flatmap/2
behaves as if defined as
flatmap(Fun, List1) -> append(map(Fun, List1)).
This started to click for me for what lists:flatmap/2
was actually doing. In the picture that I had in my head, I was expecting to flatten the list first, and then map over the items, but it does the map first, and then does only the flatten, but of only one level deep.
lists:flatmap(fun({Item, Count}) -> lists:duplicate(Count, Item) end, [{a, 1}, {b, 2}, {'C', 3}, {'_d_', 4}]). % [a,b,b,'C','C','C','_d_','_d_','_d_','_d_']
And if we pass those values to the “equivalent” behavior of calling map and then calling append on the list returned from map, we see the results are the same.
lists:append( lists:map(fun({Item, Count}) -> lists:duplicate(Count, Item) end, [{a, 1}, {b, 2}, {'C', 3}, {'_d_', 4}])). % [a,b,b,'C','C','C','_d_','_d_','_d_','_d_']
And to further clarify, lists:flatmap/2
doesn’t even do a flatten on the resulting list, but simply adjoins the lists that were returned from the mapping function. This can be seen below, as we can see there is still an nested list structure in the results, and the resulting list is not only one level deep.
lists:flatmap(fun(X) -> [X, [X]] end, [a, b, c, d]). % [a,[a],b,[b],c,[c][/c],d,[d]]
Hope this can save you the confusion I managed to get myself into,
–Proctor